The EU AI Act now runs on two clocks. One is already ticking: prohibited practices, general-purpose AI (GPAI) rules, AI Office enforcement, and chatbot and deepfake transparency. The other was reset. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, the Digital Omnibus on AI, was published in the Official Journal on 24 July 2026 and entered into force on 27 July 2026. If you read “delay” as “pause,” you will miss live obligations. This guide separates what binds you today from what you can schedule.
Quick Takeaways
- Live now: Article 5 prohibitions, AI literacy, GPAI model duties, Article 50 transparency, and AI Office enforcement.
- Delayed: Stand-alone Annex III high-risk systems move to 2 December 2027, and Annex I product-embedded systems move to 2 August 2028.
- Next hard date: 2 December 2026. Machine-readable marking for legacy generative systems and the new nudifier/CSAM ban both land that day.
- Fines: up to €35M or 7% of global turnover for prohibited practices. GPAI providers face AI Office enforcement with fines up to 3% of worldwide turnover.
EU AI Act Timeline (as of October 4, 2026)
| Date | Obligation | Status |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Feb 2025 | Article 5 bans; Article 4 AI literacy | In force |
| 2 Aug 2025 | GPAI model obligations (Arts. 51–55) | In force |
| 2 Aug 2026 | Article 50 transparency; AI Office GPAI enforcement | In force |
| 2 Dec 2026 | Marking for legacy generative systems; nudifier/CSAM ban | Upcoming |
| 2 Aug 2027 | National regulatory sandboxes (moved from 2026) | Delayed |
| 2 Dec 2027 | Annex III high-risk obligations | Delayed |
| 2 Aug 2028 | Annex I high-risk obligations | Delayed |
What the Digital Omnibus Actually Changed
The legislative path
The Parliament and Council reached political agreement on 7 May 2026. Parliament endorsed it on 16 June and the Council adopted it on 29 June. The fast track was deliberate. Lawmakers split the AI Omnibus from the wider package so the new deadlines would take effect before the original 2 August 2026 date.
Why high-risk rules slipped
The cause was infrastructure, not politics. National authorities and harmonized technical standards were not ready. The compliance logic itself, covering risk management, documentation, human oversight, and post-market monitoring, is unchanged.
Grandfathering nuance
Annex III systems placed on the EU market before the new date fall under the requirements only if they are substantially modified afterward. Treat any major retraining or feature expansion as a potential compliance trigger.
Other amendments
- AI literacy softened. Organizations now need to adopt measures that support staff AI literacy. They no longer have to guarantee a specific level.
- SME relief widened. Relief extends to small mid-caps, and machinery gets a carve-out.
- AI Office powers expanded. The AI Office gains tools for investigations, on-site inspections, binding commitments, and fines.
What Applies Right Now
Prohibited practices (Article 5)
These have applied since February 2, 2025. Social scoring, manipulative techniques, and untargeted facial-image scraping are banned. The Omnibus did not touch them.
GPAI model obligations
Providers of general-purpose models have faced duties since August 2, 2025. The final GPAI Code of Practice of 10 July 2025 serves as the practical guide. Since 2 August 2026, the AI Office can enforce them with penalties.
| GPAI Duty | Applies To | Practical Output |
|---|---|---|
| Technical documentation | All GPAI providers | Model card, training and evaluation details |
| Copyright policy | All GPAI providers | Documented opt-out and TDM handling |
| Training-data summary | All GPAI providers | Public summary using the EU template |
| Adversarial testing and evaluations | Systemic-risk models (>10²⁵ FLOPs presumption) | Red-team reports, eval logs |
| Incident reporting and cybersecurity | Systemic-risk models | Serious-incident notifications to the AI Office |
Article 50 transparency
Article 50 has applied since 2 August 2026. It splits duties between providers and deployers.
| Article 50 Duty | Who | What You Must Do |
|---|---|---|
| 50(1) Interaction disclosure | Provider | Tell users they are talking to an AI, unless obvious |
| 50(2) Machine-readable marking | Provider | Mark synthetic audio, image, video, and text as AI-generated |
| 50(3) Emotion/biometric notice | Deployer | Inform exposed people |
| 50(4) Deepfake and public-interest text labeling | Deployer | Disclose manipulated content |
Generative systems placed on the market before 2 August 2026 get a short grace period. The watermarking duty applies to them from 2 December 2026. New systems get no grace.
What’s Coming on December 2, 2026
Two items need action this quarter.
- Legacy marking deadline. If your generative product shipped before August 2, bake metadata or watermarking into outputs now.
- New Article 5 bans. AI systems that generate non-consensual intimate imagery or AI-generated child sexual abuse material become prohibited on 2 December 2026, in the tier carrying fines up to €35M or 7% of global turnover. There is no exemption for systems already on the market. A safe harbor exists for systems with effective preventive safeguards. Document your safeguards before the deadline.
What Was Delayed: High-Risk AI
Annex III covers recruitment tools, credit scoring, law enforcement, education, and border control. These systems now have until 2 December 2027. Annex I systems, such as medical devices, radio equipment, and toys, have until 2 August 2028.
Do not shelve the work. Classification still follows Article 6, and the Commission published draft classification guidelines on 19 May 2026. Agents deserve special attention. If a deployer uses an agent in a way the provider did not intend, the deployer may become the provider of a high-risk system.
Penalty Structure
| Violation | Maximum Fine |
|---|---|
| Prohibited practices (Art. 5) | €35M or 7% of global turnover |
| Most other obligations, including GPAI and Art. 50 | €15M or 3% |
| Misleading information to authorities | €7.5M or 1% |
Implementation: Build a Compliance Triage Script
Start with an inventory. This Python script flags each system against the dates above. Adapt the area list to your own legal review.
from dataclasses import dataclass
from datetime import date
ANNEX_III_AREAS = {
"employment", "education", "credit_scoring", "law_enforcement",
"border_control", "essential_services", "critical_infrastructure",
}
@dataclass
class AISystem:
name: str
use_area: str
talks_to_users: bool
generates_media_or_text: bool
launched_before_2026_08_02: bool
intimate_imagery_capable: bool = False
def triage(s: AISystem) -> list[tuple[str, date]]:
flags = []
if s.use_area in ANNEX_III_AREAS:
flags.append(("High-risk candidate (Annex III)", date(2027, 12, 2)))
if s.talks_to_users:
flags.append(("Art. 50(1) disclosure", date(2026, 8, 2)))
if s.generates_media_or_text:
deadline = date(2026, 12, 2) if s.launched_before_2026_08_02 else date(2026, 8, 2)
flags.append(("Art. 50(2) machine-readable marking", deadline))
if s.intimate_imagery_capable:
flags.append(("Possible Art. 5 ban: document safeguards", date(2026, 12, 2)))
return flags
inventory = [
AISystem("HR resume ranker", "employment", False, False, True),
AISystem("Support chatbot", "customer_service", True, True, False),
]
for system in inventory:
print(system.name, triage(system))
For chatbots, add the disclosure at the interface and API layer. Set temperature 0 on the disclosure template so the wording stays stable:
DISCLOSURE = "You are chatting with an AI assistant, not a human."
def wrap_response(text: str, first_turn: bool) -> dict:
return {
"disclosure": DISCLOSURE if first_turn else None,
"content": text,
"metadata": {"ai_generated": True}, # machine-readable flag for Art. 50(2)
}
Real-World Scenarios
HR SaaS vendor (Annex III provider). Your resume-screening product is a high-risk candidate. You have until December 2027, but harmonized standards are still arriving through late 2026 and 2027. Start classification, data governance, and logging now.
Customer-support chatbot (Art. 50 provider). Disclosure obligations have applied since August 2. Audit every entry point, including voice and messaging channels.
Image-generation startup (legacy system). You launched before August 2026. Ship invisible watermarking and metadata by December 2, 2026.
Foundation-model lab (GPAI provider). Maintain documentation, a copyright policy, and a training-data summary. If you exceed the 10²⁵ FLOPs presumption, add evaluations and incident reporting.
Enterprise deploying third-party models. You are a deployer. Label deepfakes, inform people exposed to emotion recognition, and confirm your vendor’s marking works.
Obligations by Role
| Role | Already Binding | Next Date |
|---|---|---|
| GPAI provider | Arts. 51–55; AI Office enforcement | None new |
| Generative-AI provider (new systems) | Art. 50(1)–(2) | None new |
| Generative-AI provider (legacy) | Art. 50(1) | 2 Dec 2026 (marking) |
| Annex III provider | Prohibitions, literacy | 2 Dec 2027 |
| Deployer | Prohibitions, literacy, Art. 50(3)–(4) | 2 Dec 2027 (high-risk) |
Your Q4 2026 Checklist
- Build an AI system inventory with owners and vendors.
- Classify each system under Article 6.
- Add chatbot disclosures and content marking.
- Audit products for nudifier or CSAM misuse risk, and record safeguards.
- Document an AI literacy program, scaled to your staff and context.
- Request GPAI documentation from your model vendors.
FAQ
Did the Digital Omnibus delay the entire EU AI Act?
No. It postpones only part of the high-risk obligations. Prohibitions, literacy, GPAI duties, and Article 50 transparency continue on their original schedules.
When do high-risk AI rules now apply?
Stand-alone Annex III systems must comply by 2 December 2027. Systems embedded in regulated products under Annex I must comply by 2 August 2028.
Is AI Act enforcement active today?
Yes. The Commission and AI Office can now investigate and fine GPAI providers, with penalties up to €15 million or 3% of worldwide turnover. Prohibited-practice violations carry higher fines of up to €35M or 7%.
What new AI uses are banned?
The Omnibus bans using AI to generate or manipulate child sexual abuse material and to create non-consensual intimate content depicting identifiable people. Both bans apply from 2 December 2026.




